Food mixers like the Kenwood KM240 Stand Mixer are meant to be all about providing the very best experience with minimal effort. That appears to be what users can expect here.
You get a powerful machine, a large bowl, some mixing tools and not much else.
It is meant to be all about the process and the final result than anything high-tech. So, does it deliver to user expectations on performance and quality?
There are some brands that immediately come to mind when you think of a product – which is why so many people will turn to the Kenwood KVC3100 Chef Kitchen Machine.
Kenwood has made reliable mixers and related kitchen tech for decades. The products are known for their classic feel, effective functions and high-quality construction.
Therefore, buyers expect nothing less here. Are they pleased with what they receive or could this model do more?
Kenwood food mixers have long been one of the more sought after models for keen cooks and bakers, and the Kenwood Patissier Stand Mixer aims to take this further as it focuses in on the baking side. It is a pretty unassuming looking model at face value – apart from the vast range of colour choices.
There is the adjustable head that holds the attachments, a strong metal body and a large 4l stainless steel bowl. The aim here is to provide an efficient aid for baking tasks in an easy-to-use model. Have Kenwood succeeded once again, or are there flaws in the design?
This product is no longer available. You can find other popular items here.
The specification for the Kenwood KMX050 Stand Mixer talks a lot about the looks, referring to the product as a work of art. In some ways this is understandable, especially when consumers praise the simple shapes, classic white approach and the use of clear glass in the bowl, but there has to be more to the product than that visual appeal.
This is especially true when you consider the weight behind the Kenwood name. The motor, mechanics and accessories suggest that this product should be a great choice for the keen baker but it is performing to their expectations?
